Research On Coronary Angiography By BMC | Cardiology
LinkedIn Login

Connect healthcare products, companies and hospitals with your LinkedIn network.

Facebook Login

Interact with your Facebook network around healthcare products, companies and hospitals.

Login With Facebook
MedicExchange Login

Enjoy Premium Access as a MedicExchange Member.

       Enter Your Email Address to Receive a
Copy of MedicExhange Member Demograhpics

Facebook Twitter Linkedin
Facebook: MedicExchange
Twitter: MedicExchange

Research On Coronary Angiography By BMC

Specialties - Cardiology

A research was done by BMC Health Services Research to find the impact of clinical urgency, physician supply and procedural capacity on regional variations in wait times for coronary angiography .

Despite universal health care, there continues to be regional access disparities to coronary angiography in Canada. The objective of this research was to evaluate the extent to which demand-side factors such as clinical urgency/need, and supply-side factors, as reflected by differences in physician and procedural supply account for these inequalities.

For the research a cohort was considered which consisted of 74,254 consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography in Ontario, Canada between April 1st 2005 and March 31st 2006, divided into three urgency strata based on a clinical urgency scale. Cox-proportional hazard models were developed, adjusting for age, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES), region, and urgency score, with greater hazard ratios (HR) indicating shorter wait times. To evaluate mediators of any residual wait-time differences, the influence of the regional supply of cath lab facilities, invasive cardiologists and general practitioners (GP) were examined.

The result showed that the urgency score was a significant predictor of wait time in all three strata (urgent patients: HR 1.61 for each unit increase in patient urgency (95% Confidence interval (CI) 1.55-1.67); semi-urgent patients: HR 1.55 (95% CI 1.44-1.68); elective patients: HR 1.13 (95% CI 1.08-1.18)).

After accounting for clinical need/urgency, regional wait time differences persisted; these were most consistently associated with variation in cath lab supply. The impact of invasive cardiologist supply was restricted to urgent patients while that of GP supply was confined to semi-urgent and elective patients.

The researchers concluded that there remained significant regional disparities in access to coronary angiography after accounting for clinical need. These disparities were partially explained by variations in supply of both procedural capacity and physician services, most notably in elective and semi-urgent patients.

Source: BMC Health Services Research

You can discuss more about Cardiology and related topics in our Cardiology Community.