|
Facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Five HL7 Standards For Meaningful Use Standards Final Rule
Five HL7 Standards For Meaningful Use Standards Final Rule
Wednesday, 21 July 2010 00:10 | 
| Healthcare IT News - Healthcare Informatics |
Version 2.5.1 implementation guide for electronic laboratory reporting to public health now among HL7 Publications Needed for Meaningful Use.
Health Level Seven International (HL7), the global authority for interoperability and standards in healthcare information technology, today announced that five of its standards and guides will be used in the U.S. final rule on standards and certification criteria for meaningful use.
The interim final rule published in January of this year included:
- HL7 Version 2.5.1 for the submission of lab results to public health agencies.
- HL7 Version 2.3.1 or Version 2.5.1 for submitting information to public health agencies for surveillance or reporting (excluding adverse event reporting).
- HL7 Version 2.3.1 or Version 2.5.1 for submitting information to immunization registries as the content exchange standard and the CDC maintained HL7 standard code CVX—Vaccines Administered as the vocabulary standard.
- HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2 (CDA) Continuity of Care Document (CCD), a Version 3 standard based on the HL7 Reference Information Model, as one of two options for content exchange standards for the receipt of a patient summary record.
In addition, the final rule now includes the HL7 Version 2.5.1 Implementation Guide for Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Public Health when HL7 Version 2.5.1 is used for reporting lab results to public health agencies.
HL7 Members are Heard by ONC
- Overlaps and Inconsistencies with Previously Selected Standards Are Reduced
HL7 recommended that ONC provide clarification on overlaps and inconsistencies between standards required for use in Federal Agencies under Executive Order 13410 and standards that had been previously recognized under this order. The final rule incorporates many more of the implementation guides that had been previously recognized by HHS as requirements, including the ANSI/HITSP C32 Version 2.5 implementation guide. These changes greatly reduce the number of inconsistencies and overlaps between the final rule and Executive Order 13410.
- Implementation Guidance Has Been Added
- Transport Standards Inconsistencies Eliminated
HL7 recommended that the transport standards section be altered to accommodate the use of the selected HL7 standards. The final rule does not make any recommendations for transport.
- Description of CCD Improved
HL7 observed that the description of CCD in the Interim Final Rule was inaccurate. The interim final rule described CCD as being a Level 2 implementation guide of CDA. CCD supports both structured narrative (Level 2) and coded data (Level 3). ONC corrected these errors. Furthermore the selection of the HITSP C32 Version 2.5 Specification for implementation guidance means that CCD documents exchanged for meaningful use will contain coded data (Level 3).
- Use of Appropriate Standards for Discharge Summaries
HL7 pointed out that Discharge Summaries require content that is not described or supported in the CCD. ONC acknowledged that Discharge Summary documentation can be separated from the content of the CCD, but did not select an alternative standard for them.
- Use EHRs for Clinical Purposes
HL7 recommended that the text in the Interim Final rule which required use of the EHR to perform eligibility and claims transactions be removed, as this is inconsistent with EHR systems as described by the HL7 EHR Functional Model. The final rule removes the requirement for the EHR to perform claims or eligibility transactions.
“The final rule on standards for meaningful use will improve the potential for interoperable exchange between healthcare providers. HL7 and its members are proud to have been a contributor to this historic regulation,” said HL7 CEO Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD. “The HIT Standards Committee deserves our gratitude for this significant achievement. We must continue to advance the vision of the committee if we hope to reach the goal of improving the care of our patients.”
