Enter Your Email Address to Receive a
Copy of MedicExhange Member Demograhpics

Good vision is critical to a radiologist's ability to make accurate interpretations

A new study report appeared in the September issue of RSNA News is raising awareness about the visual accuracy of radiologists as well as questions about the need to create vision requirements within the specialty. The research was done by University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSM) in Baltimore and it was was originally published in the June 2009 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.

The study shows that 16.7 percent of the radiologists surveyed don't recall ever having their vision tested and 35 percent said it had been 24 months or longer since their last vision exam. Considering that good vision is critical to a radiologist's ability to make accurate interpretations, the results proved somewhat surprising to lead author Nabile Safdar, M.D., an assistant professor in the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and nuclear medicine at UMSM.

"Most radiologists have 20/20 vision or better, which we expected, but we didn't expect to see such variability in terms of how radiologists are taking care of their own vision," he said. "While so much attention and research has been dedicated to imaging technology, we hadn't looked at whether or not the radiologist can actually see the fine level of detail that is being shown, which is important because physicians and patients depend on the ability of radiologists to accurately discriminate findings."

The the study conducted in 2005 and 2006, 48 radiologists from four institutions completed a brief survey before undergoing visual acuity testing at three separate times during the day. Subjects wore corrective lenses if routinely used. Testing was performed with modified versions of a U.S. Federal Aviation Administration visual acuity test instrument. Results showed that eight of the 48 participating radiologists could not recall ever having their vision examined and 14 of the participants reported that their last eye examinations were 24 months or more in the past.

The study also found that not every radiologist had 20/20 vision, a few needed visual correction, and more than a few had not undergone a thorough eye examination in as long as 15 years. While the study's goal was not to determine whether results affected patient outcomes, Dr. Safdar said it is reasonable to think they could.

"There is absolutely no study that says a radiologist's vision has to be 20/20 in order to render accurate interpretations," according to Leonard Berlin, M.D., vice-chair of the Department of Radiology at NorthShore University HealthSystem, Skokie Hospital in Skokie, Ill., and chair of the RSNA Professionalism Committee. "I admit it would be difficult for a blind radiologist to do an adequate job, but various limited impairments of a radiologist's eyes do not necessarily make him or her inadequate as a radiologist," said Dr. Berlin

Another study currently under way, Elizabeth Krupinski, Ph.D., a professor of radiology at the University of Arizona in Tucson and president-elect of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, and Kevin Berbaum, Ph.D., a professor of radiology at the University of Iowa in Iowa City, are examining the impact of visual fatigue on diagnostic accuracy.

Researchers are acquiring an objective measure of fatigue by using a refractometer to record visual accommodation (the ability to maintain focus) before and after a day of reading images. Drs. Krupinski and Berbaum are also surveying radiologists on fatigue in the workplace. To measure diagnostic accuracy, subjects are reading a set of 60 bone cases—with and without fractures—once early in the day and once after spending time reading images.

Dr. Krupinski said she believes the results of her study of 40 radiologists and Dr. Safdar's study of 48 subjects will be mirrored in a larger group of radiologists. She said she does not, however, feel the outcome of these studies should lead to regulation.

"I don't really think so—I can't think of a medical discipline that requires that," Dr. Krupinski said. "I just think radiologists should be aware of their vision and we are hoping this study helps with that."

Source: RSNA

You can discuss more about Radiology and related topics in  our Radiology Group