PET Scans Differentiates High- and Low-Risk Uterine Tumors | Radiology Articles
LinkedIn Login

Connect healthcare products, companies and hospitals with your LinkedIn network.

Facebook Login

Interact with your Facebook network around healthcare products, companies and hospitals.

Login With Facebook
MedicExchange Login

Enjoy Premium Access as a MedicExchange Member.

       Enter Your Email Address to Receive a
Copy of MedicExhange Member Demograhpics

Facebook Twitter Linkedin
Facebook: MedicExchange
Twitter: MedicExchange

PET Scans Differentiates High- and Low-Risk Uterine Tumors

Radiology News - Radiology Articles


Molecular imaging could offer a new way to gauge the aggressiveness of a deadly cancer of the uterus.

Scientists in Japan developed a technique using two fluorescent tracers, imaged with a PET scan, to tell apart the slow-acting and aggressive varieties of endometrial cancer  tumors of the lining of the uterus, one of the most common malignant tumors in women. The researchers, led by Testuya Tsujikawa, Ph.D., of the University of Fukui in Japan, looked at 22 women who had either known endometrial tumors or showed an early warning sign: thickening of the uterine lining. They gave the patients both 18F-fluoroestradiol, a fluorescently tagged female hormone, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, fluorescently tagged glucose.

The reasoning behind this is that low-risk tumors of the uterus tend to behave like normal tissue, and respond to estrogen, whereas high-risk, viciously malignant tumors consume huge amounts of glucose. The doctors suspected that "well-behaved" tumors would have high FES (estrogen) uptake, but low FGS (glucose) uptake, whereas the reverse would be true of nasty tumors. And that's exactly what the doctors found when they looked at the combination of tracers through a PET scan.

The results were about 86 percent accurate, when compared against a sample later taken from a biopsy, the gold standard in endometrial cancer diagnosis. However, the tracers are only predictive of cancer aggressiveness when used together. David Mankoff, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of radiology at the University of Washington in Seattle, who's a member of the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and who conducts similar research on breast and thyroid cancers, hails this as an important new discovery, and sees great promise in the paradigm. He thinks this technique could work on different cancers around the body, such as breast cancer, where low-risk tumors are also known to act like healthy tissue and process estrogen. Nonetheless, he's cautious about any immediate clinical applications, and doesn't think this method will directly replace biopsies.

"It's an intriguing result from the scientific standpoint," he tells DOTmed News. "I hope that, more than anything else, this study stimulates more trials." And it is doing so, at least among Dr. Okazawa's group. They are currently working on whether this method could be useful in telling apart uterine fibroids, a painful but benign condition, from the rare malignant version, leiomyosarcoma. Last month, they also submitted a paper comparing the results from the PET scans to those from immunohistological studies.

Source: Journal of Nuclear Medicine.


You can discuss more about Radiology in Japan India  in our Radiology in Japan Group.